Except for the CLOS code, timings do not include compilation time. The garbage collector is run before each test to try to make the timings more repeatable. Remember that the only real benchmark is your application: this code is only representative of real-life programs to a limited extent. For certain targets, we assume that the times reported by GET-INTERNAL-RUN-TIME and GET-INTERNAL-REAL-TIME are accurate.
The code for these performance benchmarks can be downloaded from http://www.chez.com/emarsden/downloads/cl-bench.tar.gz. (For some reason this seems to error out as a direct link but not when accessed from the following page: http://www.chez.com/emarsden/downloads/.)
Here is an example of the type of results you can obtain, for x86 and SPARC platforms. To interpret these numbers: the number in the Reference column is a number of seconds taken to execute that test. The other numbers are the relative performance of that implementation, so for example a number of 1.3 means 30% slower than the reference implementation. A number of -1 means that the corresponding test was not run on that implementation, either because it does not support the given feature (certain types of method combination for CLISP, for instance), or because of implementation limits (heap size limit on LispWorks Personal, for example).
,---- Pentium III@1.1GHz, 512MB RAM --- | | Benchmark Reference CMUCL CMUCL CLISP SBCL Poplog | CMUCL 18c 18d 18dsm 2.27.2 0.7.1 2.0 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | BOYER 1.50 0.73 0.74 5.61 1.01 3.03 | BROWSE 0.61 0.74 0.74 2.54 1.26 2.85 | DDerviv 0.66 0.52 0.53 2.14 1.15 1.62 | Deriv 1.29 0.50 0.48 2.05 1.10 1.26 | DESTRUCTIVE 1.05 0.91 0.95 3.17 1.13 3.38 | DIV2-TEST-1 1.09 0.51 0.51 1.66 1.07 1.29 | DIV2-TEST-2 0.54 0.52 0.61 1.69 1.09 1.31 | FFT 0.19 1.00 1.00 37.00 1.21 91.21 | FRPOLY/FIXNUM 0.54 0.87 0.89 6.85 1.09 3.00 | FRPOLY/BIGNUM 1.30 0.73 0.74 2.44 1.08 1.39 | FRPOLY/FLOAT 0.54 0.76 0.78 4.41 1.06 2.11 | PUZZLE 0.68 0.99 0.99 25.09 9.35 27.93 | TAK 0.79 0.97 0.97 9.08 1.25 3.10 | CTAK 0.73 1.00 0.97 6.49 1.05 4.84 | TRTAK 0.79 0.97 0.97 9.13 1.25 3.11 | TAKL 1.37 1.01 1.00 7.70 1.27 4.02 | STAK 0.96 1.02 1.02 7.07 1.08 1.50 | FPRINT 1.21 0.92 0.82 1.06 2.28 4.17 | TRAVERSE 2.00 0.94 0.99 11.45 1.50 5.42 | TRIANGLE 1.70 1.01 1.01 17.58 1.28 23.19 | RICHARDS 0.53 1.00 0.98 21.26 1.00 6.47 | FACTORIAL 0.37 0.54 0.57 0.81 1.14 0.62 | FIB 0.33 1.00 1.00 5.30 1.06 1.18 | RATIOS 2.24 0.96 0.96 0.12 0.96 1.81 | BIGNUM/ELEM-100-1000 1.06 0.92 0.97 0.08 0.97 2.27 | BIGNUM/ELEM-1000-100 4.99 0.99 0.99 0.05 0.93 2.14 | BIGNUM/ELEM-10000-1 5.19 1.01 1.00 0.05 0.92 12.90 | BIGNUM/PARI-100-10 1.21 0.99 1.02 0.02 0.95 0.04 | BIGNUM/PARI-200-5 14.30 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.92 0.01 | HASH-STRINGS 1.15 0.84 0.69 3.25 0.99 30.89 | HASH-INTEGERS 0.44 0.80 0.66 2.75 1.27 6.95 | BOEHM-GC 6.41 0.47 0.46 4.10 1.12 1.53 | DEFLATE 1.16 1.00 1.02 6.34 1.52 5.53 | CLOS/defclass 1.75 0.90 0.92 0.53 2.53 0.06 | CLOS/defmethod 8.73 0.77 0.71 0.02 2.17 0.00 | CLOS/instantiate 6.42 0.57 0.54 0.96 0.99 3.57 | CLOS/methodcalls 8.17 0.42 0.44 1.01 0.90 3.93 | CLOS/method+after 10.76 0.84 0.77 0.47 2.42 2.01 | CLOS/complex-methods 0.29 1.07 1.14 -1.00 6.17 -1.00 | 1D-ARRAYS 2.44 0.81 0.79 5.68 1.39 15.75 | 2D-ARRAYS 11.28 0.99 0.89 3.45 4.39 6.04 | BITVECTORS 2.01 0.82 0.81 0.60 0.98 -1.00 | FILL-STRINGS 6.83 0.88 0.82 1.16 3.77 27.38 | fill-strings/adjustable 14.18 0.99 0.87 1.36 1.73 118.49 | BENCH-STRING-CONCAT 5.79 1.88 1.62 -1.00 2.75 -1.00 | | Reference implementation: CMU Common Lisp 18c | Impl 18d: CMU Common Lisp 18d-pre, level-1 built 2002-04-08 on melbourne | Impl 18dsm: CMU Common Lisp 18d-pre-small, level-1 built 2002-04-08 on sydney | Impl CLISP: CLISP 2.27.2 (released 2001-10-05) (built 3222523548) (memory 3222523674) | Impl SBCL : SBCL 0.7.1.22 (from debian testing) | Impl Poplog: Sussex Poplog Common Lisp 2.0 | Linux melbourne 2.4.17 #2 SMP Wed Feb 6 11:35:03 CET 2002 i686 unknown | (declaim (optimize (speed 3) (space 0) (safety 1) (debug 0) (compilation-speed 0))) `----,---- UltraSPARCIIe at 500MHz, 640MB RAM, SunOS 5.8 --- | | Benchmark Reference CMU C CLISP | ----------------------------------------------------- | BOYER 3.98 0.91 8.03 | BROWSE 1.72 0.91 2.85 | DDerviv 2.02 0.75 3.21 | Deriv 3.63 0.81 3.13 | DESTRUCTIVE 3.11 1.01 4.18 | DIV2-TEST-1 2.19 0.83 3.92 | DIV2-TEST-2 1.12 0.82 3.85 | FFT 0.74 1.03 28.86 | FRPOLY/FIXNUM 1.87 1.01 7.89 | FRPOLY/BIGNUM 4.59 1.29 3.07 | FRPOLY/FLOAT 1.65 0.96 5.68 | PUZZLE 2.07 0.95 30.62 | CTAK 2.74 1.01 9.04 | TAK 1.84 1.00 14.08 | RTAK 1.84 1.01 13.95 | TAKL 3.37 1.01 11.63 | STAK 2.32 1.01 8.87 | FPRINT 4.17 1.02 1.12 | TRAVERSE 5.84 0.99 13.74 | TRIANGLE 5.53 0.86 15.57 | CASCOR 10.53 0.73 52.81 | RICHARDS 2.35 0.94 22.46 | FACTORIAL 1.46 1.48 2.88 | FIB 0.94 0.99 6.71 | BIGNUM/ELEM-100-1000 2.80 1.24 0.28 | BIGNUM/ELEM-1000-100 10.14 1.19 0.44 | BIGNUM/ELEM-10000-1 11.38 1.35 0.41 | BIGNUM/PARI-100-10 2.76 1.15 0.09 | BIGNUM/PARI-200-5 27.19 1.06 0.05 | READ-LINE 3.39 1.06 1.19 | HASH-STRINGS 5.42 1.20 2.19 | HASH-INTEGERS 1.61 0.76 2.00 | BOEHM-GC 19.97 0.76 4.14 | CLOS/defclass 4.78 1.01 0.81 | CLOS/defmethod 27.61 0.89 0.03 | CLOS/instantiate 20.93 0.85 1.28 | CLOS/methodcalls 23.62 1.08 1.94 | CLOS/method+after 33.70 1.07 0.78 | CLOS/complex-methods 1.41 0.92 -1.00 | 1D-ARRAYS 10.77 0.92 3.51 | 2D-ARRAYS 56.66 1.40 2.61 | BITVECTORS 5.35 0.86 0.42 | FILL-STRINGS 18.88 1.07 0.97 | fill-strings/adjustable 45.09 1.46 1.41 | BENCH-STRING-CONCAT 48.10 0.90 -1.00 | | Reference implementation: CMU Common Lisp 18c, Built 2000-11-27 | Impl CMU C: CMU Common Lisp 18d-pre, level-1 built 2001-12-12 on liszt | Impl CLISP: CLISP 2.27.2 (released 2001-10-05) (built on moustacho) | SunOS eagles 5.8 Generic_108528-10 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 `----
Note that results prior to 2002-01 were a little bogus, since the optimization settings were not being set correctly across implementations, so default optimization levels were used.
If anyone can run these against ACL (not the trial version, whose heap size limits prevent most of these tests from running) I would appreciate obtaining the results. -- Eric Marsden
----
I reran the cl-bench benchmarks, using newer versions of SBCL and OpenMCL. I aimed for ~10 seconds of run time per individual benchmark. Compiler optimization made this impossible on some tests.
I would like to include Lispworks, but the personal edition has a heap size limitation that prevents many of the tests from completing. No bias is intended!
I did not bother with the Allegro alisp8 runs this time.
SBCL no longer crashes on the CLOS tests.
A quick hand count shows:
Allegro 47/65 SBCL 14/65 OpenMCL 4/65
The test machine is a dual 2.5 G5, running OS X 10.4.2
Benchmark Reference OpenMCL SBCL
ACL 7.0 0.14.3 0.9.4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPILER [ 10.80 ] 0.99* 3.33
LOAD-FASL [ 9.77*] 2.83 3.51
SUM-PERMUTATIONS [ 10.68*] 3.05 1.86
WALK-LIST/SEQ [ 0.01*] 5.50 2.60
WALK-LIST/MESS [ 0.02*] 2.00 2.85
BOYER [ 14.94 ] 1.83 0.65*
BROWSE [ 10.89*] 2.62 4.17
DDERIV [ 10.21*] 4.65 8.26
DERIV [ 10.90*] 4.60 8.95
DESTRUCTIVE [ 10.32*] 3.47 5.47
DIV2-TEST-1 [ 11.01*] 12.54 22.10
DIV2-TEST-2 [ 9.80*] 10.11 18.23
FFT [ 10.76*] 116.68 1.07
FRPOLY/FIXNUM [ 12.02*] 1.84 2.47
FRPOLY/BIGNUM [ 11.91*] 2.60 3.12
FRPOLY/FLOAT [ 10.84*] 2.89 2.59
PUZZLE [ 10.91 ] 4.89 0.50*
TAK [ 11.76*] 1.39 1.70
CTAK [ 11.31 ] 0.93 0.59*
TRTAK [ 10.58*] 1.39 1.79
TAKL [ 11.74 ] 1.71 0.82*
STAK [ 11.53 ] 0.37 0.15*
FPRINT/UGLY [ 10.41*] 10.81 4.50
FPRINT/PRETTY [ 9.87*] 5.78 4.98
TRAVERSE [ 11.05*] 1.77 1.04
TRIANGLE [ 10.72 ] 1.84 0.75*
RICHARDS [ 10.66 ] 0.75 0.64*
FACTORIAL [ 10.72*] 7.25 9.42
FIB [ 11.87*] 1.49 2.51
FIB-RATIO [ 10.92*] 4.40 8.20
ACKERMANN [ 13.47 ] 0.52* 0.81
MANDELBROT/COMPLEX [ 11.02*] 2.61 8.44
MANDELBROT/DFLOAT [ 11.79*] 56.63 4.89
MRG32K3A [ 11.92 ] 16.34 0.57*
CRC40 [ 13.95*] 3.31 2.82
BIGNUM/ELEM-100-1000 [ 11.64*] 3.92 2.03
BIGNUM/ELEM-1000-100 [ 11.98 ] 5.38 0.87*
BIGNUM/ELEM-10000-1 [ 11.94 ] 5.00 0.40*
BIGNUM/PARI-100-10 [ 11.67*] 25.08 3.81
BIGNUM/PARI-200-5 [ 11.98*] 68.45 2.92
PI-DECIMAL/SMALL [ 12.09*] 12.20 5.51
PI-DECIMAL/BIG [ 10.29*] 35.78 3.33
PI-ATAN [ 11.35*] 3.41 5.75
PI-RATIOS [ 11.44*] 2.96 2.84
HASH-STRINGS [ 11.70 ] 0.53 0.31*
HASH-INTEGERS [ 11.84*] 15.67 4.92
SLURP-LINES [ 10.39*] 4.80 26.57
BOEHM-GC [ 13.29*] 4.84 2.78
DEFLATE-FILE [ 11.27*] 1.56 1.42
1D-ARRAYS [ 11.01 ] 0.92* 1.19
2D-ARRAYS [ 11.13*] 18.09 2.23
3D-ARRAYS [ 12.00*] 17.90 1.88
BITVECTORS [ 10.55*] 62.95 15.56
BENCH-STRINGS [ 11.88*] 4.20 1.10
fill-strings/adjustable [ 15.82*] 7.70 7.37
SEARCH-SEQUENCE [ 11.92 ] 1.35 0.10*
CLOS/defclass [ 10.70*] 102.03 1323.65
CLOS/defmethod [ 11.71 ] 0.68* 197.61
CLOS/instantiate [ 10.30*] 7.38 126.80
CLOS/simple-instantiate [ 9.46*] 40.98 157.12
CLOS/methodcalls [ 10.47*] 3.59 32.44
CLOS/method+after [ 11.32*] 3.11 79.45
CLOS/complex-methods [ 11.23 ] 3.19 0.61*
EQL-SPECIALIZED-FIB [ 12.10 ] 1.48 0.60*
Reference time in first column is in seconds; other columns are relative
Reference implementation: International Allegro CL Professional Edition 7.0 [Mac OS X] (Sep 29, 2005 18:24)
Impl OpenM: OpenMCL Version (Beta: Darwin) 0.14.3
Impl SBCL : SBCL 0.9.4
=== Test machine ===
Machine-type: PowerPC
Machine-version: Power Macintosh
This page is linked from: Benchmarks
CLiki pages can be edited by anyone at any time. Imagine a fearsomely comprehensive disclaimer of liability. Now fear, comprehensively