Edit history: 2004-07-20, Version 1 by Bruno Haible
Status: For CLiki consideration
- Problem Description:
- The specification for DEFCLASS is a bit strange - in particular the use of reader-function-name for both :reader and :accessor, with two different descriptions given.
- Proposal (DEFCLASS-READER-FUNCTION-NAME:USE-ACCESSOR):
- In DEFCLASS, use accessor-function-name in place of reader-function-name.
- Test case:
- Current practice:
- Cost to Implementors:
- Cost to Users:
- Cost of Non-Adoption:
- Bruno Haible supports USE-ACCESSOR.